The Obama administration has sought to reduce American military entanglements abroad, withdrawing forces from Iraq two years ago and moving to do the same in Afghanistan next year. So how has it come to pass that we are now moving toward another military entanglement, this time in Syria?
The Syrian conflict affects American foreign policy in a number of ways, but the Obama administration has approached it cautiously, not only because it wants to reduce American military engagement overseas but also because the conflict is complicated and quickly shifting. The rise of sectarianism and the slow collapse of the state in Syria poses a danger to the Middle East as a whole. Millions of refugees have fled to neighboring nations, including Jordan, Lebanon and Turkey, destabilizing them and inflaming sectarian tensions. Violence has also sporadically spilled over into Iraq, Lebanon and Turkey and even Israel, raising the specter of a broader conflict.
Last week, the Syrian government is believed to have killed hundreds of civilians in a chemical attack on the Sunni-majority suburbs of the capital, Damascus, violating international law and crossing what the Obama administration has called a “red line.” It is believed to be the largest chemical weapons attack since Saddam Hussein of Iraq used a gas attack on the Kurds in 1988, and some observers, including senior Israeli officials, have argued that allowing it to go unpunished sets a dangerous precedent for Syria and its main ally, Iran, suggesting that the use of chemical agents could be tolerated in the future.

KEVIN Rudd's electorate of Griffith and a swag of marginal Brisbane seats would be the big winners from the Prime Minister's plan to relocate Australia's main east coast naval base to the Queensland capital, a move that would rip thousands of jobs and billions of dollars out of Sydney.
The proposed move to Brisbane, which would cost at least $6 billion and involve the transfer of 4000 jobs, was first raised in March last year in the Force Posture Review prepared for the Gillard government, but it was rejected in May this year in the Defence white paper on cost and environmental grounds.
The move to scale down Sydney's Garden Island, Australia's oldest and largest naval base, and transfer its operations to Brisbane was met with outrage in Sydney, where NSW Premier Barry O'Farrell confronted Mr Rudd and condemned him for his lack of consultation. "A phone call would have been helpful," Mr O'Farrell told the Prime Minister as they crossed paths near Mrs Macquarie's Chair at Sydney Harbour. "Four thousand jobs. Your predecessor could share, you should learn to share. Four thousand jobs are going to be thrown on the scrapheap all to try and save some Labor seats in Queensland. It's outrageous."